Surprised, and not surprised: Feather Linux at 150Mhz, 32Mb

Some things surprise even me. And yet, at the same time, this isn’t a surprise.


I was racking my brain a few weeks ago, trying to remember a distro I had tinkered with probably four years ago, when I was looking for a suitable low-end distro for yet another low-end wonder.

I don’t think I made any mention of it here, because if I search this site for “Feather Linux,” not much comes up. And to be honest, outside of this site, I don’t see much mention of it either.

Fact is, given the opportunity to mention a lightweight distro, most people jump straight for the jugular and shout “DSL” or “Slitaz.” Not that there’s anything wrong with either of those.

But something low-end-but-not-wicked-sparse like Feather Linux probably never got the benefit of the doubt. I am sure there are some 200Mhz machines out there that would benefit greatly from Feather, but are force-fed DSL apace because it’s “light.”

If I understand the home page correctly, Feather started as a Knoppix remaster, with a little of this and a little of that, and matured all the way to version 0.7.5 — with kernel 2.4.27 and Firefox 1.04 — before it became a ghost distro.

And that’s a shame. Honestly, this runs magnificently at 150Mhz and is only using a fraction of its 32Mb to show the desktop. I can start most programs without heavy swapping or losing system response, provided they’re not overweight to start with. 🙄

Boot times are not stellar, but are relatively quick. In a world where Gnome Ubuntu setups on reasonably fast but slightly out-of-date machines can take a full three minutes, two minutes for a Pentium to load Feather Linux is an achievement.

And the variety of software at your disposal is amazing. Everything from Abiword to Siag to Sylpheed to Elmo to XMMS to e3 … and much more. I cower in awe. 😯

All that in 128Mb. Just the “Net” submenu is a veritable who’s-who of Linux network software. But I won’t pretend Feather is god’s gift to the ancient computer; it has a few shortcomings that are noteworthy.

First of all, kernel 2.4.27 did things a little differently than what I’m used to now. I have this machine on a very reliable wireless card, but can’t get it on my in-house network to save my life.

Similarly, sound is a mystery, although I daresay I could solve that in a matter of a few minutes, if I really wanted to. I feel I have enough information and experience now to pin down the audio with a few experimental commands.

But I could say that about any distro, from aLinux to Fedora to Salix to ZOMG Linux. No matter what you use, you should be ready to tweak a few things, to make it your own.

But Feather Linux is something I feel confident in recommending. Depending on your hardware, and depending on your ability level, and depending on your patience, this could be only a few steps away from regular use.

It’s out-of-date and esoteric in some ways, but that doesn’t mean you can’t put it to use on your closet-dweller. Try it out.


14 thoughts on “Surprised, and not surprised: Feather Linux at 150Mhz, 32Mb

  1. prinzzchavo


    Just when I was this || close to sticking with Slitaz loram for a while, you write about Feather Linux… and I have to start investigating again!

    Thanks for the tip, I have already read a lot about kernel 2.4 being still developed, since it fits old hardware without that much bloat…but never really found a distro to test it out.

    I just hope my family never find out where you live… ¬¬

    1. Debianero Rumbero

      For low-end PCs I still prefer Debian, besides all packages are up-to-date.

      For very very low-end PCs, is better to run Debian without X environment.

      1. anon

        Try and say that with Lenny. It’s like a snapshot of 2007 software! I have to use the lenny-backports to get software at times.

  2. JIm C

    yeh I remember Feather Linux very nice at the time
    Have you tried Antix M8 , it was the only recent small distro I could get to boot in gui with 64mb ?

  3. Pingback: Links 27/9/2010: Audiocasts, Fedora 14 Preview | Techrights

  4. Jim C

    I tried tiny core, dsl,puppy and a few of my other regulars
    that’s why I suggested Antix above, performance wise it really shone on the old hardware.

  5. Chris B

    I had high hopes of Antix 7.5 when I read a review but the box I want to run it on is an AMD K6 and Antix 7.5 chokes on the AMD K5 and K6 CPUs.

  6. Pingback: In two flavors: AntiX at 150Mhz, 32Mb « Motho ke motho ka botho

  7. Pingback: Feather Linux’s perl script « Motho ke motho ka botho

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s