<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debian and Arch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tidux</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-49243</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tidux]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 23:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-49243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part of what makes Debian special is the WM-agnostic menu and the list of alternatives.  Instead of doing a bunch of if-else checks every time something that&#039;s not a browser passes an http:// URI to &quot;the browser,&quot; or risk having inconsistent behavior, just point it to x-www-browser.  Use a lightweight window manager but hate hand-hacking menus in various obtuse configuration formats?  That&#039;s where the Debian menu comes in handy.  It&#039;s a little extra complexity if you know up front what programs you&#039;ll use, but it&#039;s a godsend for people who like trying out different environments like me.

tl;dr 
# update-alternatives --config x-terminal-emulator
select the relevant number

and presto changeo, your default terminal has changed in GNOME, Openbox, Fluxbox, Window Maker, wmii, and any other wacky environment you use.  All at the same time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Part of what makes Debian special is the WM-agnostic menu and the list of alternatives.  Instead of doing a bunch of if-else checks every time something that&#8217;s not a browser passes an http:// URI to &#8220;the browser,&#8221; or risk having inconsistent behavior, just point it to x-www-browser.  Use a lightweight window manager but hate hand-hacking menus in various obtuse configuration formats?  That&#8217;s where the Debian menu comes in handy.  It&#8217;s a little extra complexity if you know up front what programs you&#8217;ll use, but it&#8217;s a godsend for people who like trying out different environments like me.</p>
<p>tl;dr<br />
# update-alternatives &#8211;config x-terminal-emulator<br />
select the relevant number</p>
<p>and presto changeo, your default terminal has changed in GNOME, Openbox, Fluxbox, Window Maker, wmii, and any other wacky environment you use.  All at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 1/4/2011: Linux 2.6.39 Previews, GNOME 3 Live Images &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 1/4/2011: Linux 2.6.39 Previews, GNOME 3 Live Images &#124; Techrights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 20:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Debian and Arch I’ve mentioned two or three times now that I have been spending a lot of time in Arch and Debian these days. I hold both distros in equally high regard for being fast, light and good starting points for outdated machines. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Debian and Arch I’ve mentioned two or three times now that I have been spending a lot of time in Arch and Debian these days. I hold both distros in equally high regard for being fast, light and good starting points for outdated machines. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anticapitalista</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anticapitalista]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 18:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could use grub-legacy instead of grub2 on Debian to solve the first issue you have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could use grub-legacy instead of grub2 on Debian to solve the first issue you have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roland</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48707</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are ur thoughts on slackware? I use it on my p4 box and works great whereas arch was a little buggy with some x driver.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are ur thoughts on slackware? I use it on my p4 box and works great whereas arch was a little buggy with some x driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 10:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is no good for cli only machines but for those that get as far as installing X - Galternatives http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=galternatives]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is no good for cli only machines but for those that get as far as installing X &#8211; Galternatives <a href="http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=galternatives" rel="nofollow">http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=galternatives</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apt installs recommended packages by default, which can lead to having a bunch of unnecessary packages.  Adding the following to /etc/apt/apt.conf (you may need to create it) will turn it off.

APT::Install-Recommends &quot;0&quot;;
APT::Install-Suggests &quot;0&quot;;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apt installs recommended packages by default, which can lead to having a bunch of unnecessary packages.  Adding the following to /etc/apt/apt.conf (you may need to create it) will turn it off.</p>
<p>APT::Install-Recommends &#8220;0&#8243;;<br />
APT::Install-Suggests &#8220;0&#8243;;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iasdbu</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48703</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iasdbu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I too dislike debian&#039;s behaviour: &quot;Hey, if you want X, you need Iceweasel &#124; Chromium &#124; Galeon &#124; ... &quot;.

What if I want to download and install Chrome 10 from their website? &quot;Well, you could, but you should also install Iceweasel &#124; Chromium &#124; Epiphany &#124; Konqueror ...&quot; wtf?

Even Ubuntu doesn&#039;t force you to do that... Is there a way to turn the damn thing off?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too dislike debian&#8217;s behaviour: &#8220;Hey, if you want X, you need Iceweasel | Chromium | Galeon | &#8230; &#8220;.</p>
<p>What if I want to download and install Chrome 10 from their website? &#8220;Well, you could, but you should also install Iceweasel | Chromium | Epiphany | Konqueror &#8230;&#8221; wtf?</p>
<p>Even Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t force you to do that&#8230; Is there a way to turn the damn thing off?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jraz</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jraz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 23:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/29/debian-and-arch/#comment-48701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IMHO i think the Debian developers finally bowed to the pressure to be like other distributions in regards to X. Often I read in forums about video issues and the usual solution is to create an xorg.conf. That should say something.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO i think the Debian developers finally bowed to the pressure to be like other distributions in regards to X. Often I read in forums about video issues and the usual solution is to create an xorg.conf. That should say something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
