<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EasyTag 1, Apple 0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Micah</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/#comment-48559</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Micah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/#comment-48559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EasyTag can only view certain metadata fields (title, artist, album, year, track, genre, comment, composer, original artist, copyright, URL, and encoded by); with puddletag, you can view ALL metadata embedded in audio files. The trouble is, even standard, rules-abiding id3v2 tags can contain a lot more metadata than that. I find that the inability to view that data in EasyTag to be a serious shortcoming.

Puddletag, on the other hand, lets you view ALL the metadata embedded in a file, and lets you configure how much of it you want displayed in your main work window. FWIW, while I found EasyTag&#039;s &quot;workflow&quot; to be fine once I got used to the program, Puddletag is probably easier to use even if it has a lot more options (for instance, you don&#039;t need to save every edit to a file, nor do you need to specifically tell puddletag to apply those changes to more than one file at a time when you have multiple files selected). Anyway, puddletag&#039;s worth a look!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EasyTag can only view certain metadata fields (title, artist, album, year, track, genre, comment, composer, original artist, copyright, URL, and encoded by); with puddletag, you can view ALL metadata embedded in audio files. The trouble is, even standard, rules-abiding id3v2 tags can contain a lot more metadata than that. I find that the inability to view that data in EasyTag to be a serious shortcoming.</p>
<p>Puddletag, on the other hand, lets you view ALL the metadata embedded in a file, and lets you configure how much of it you want displayed in your main work window. FWIW, while I found EasyTag&#8217;s &#8220;workflow&#8221; to be fine once I got used to the program, Puddletag is probably easier to use even if it has a lot more options (for instance, you don&#8217;t need to save every edit to a file, nor do you need to specifically tell puddletag to apply those changes to more than one file at a time when you have multiple files selected). Anyway, puddletag&#8217;s worth a look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkduck</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/#comment-48554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[darkduck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/easytag-1-apple-0/#comment-48554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;any machine that transfers control of your product to some corporation …
Yep, Apple does too much to get control of your data...

From another side, doesn&#039;t Google do the same in Android?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;any machine that transfers control of your product to some corporation …<br />
Yep, Apple does too much to get control of your data&#8230;</p>
<p>From another side, doesn&#8217;t Google do the same in Android?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
