Mint vs. LMDE: Sudden weight gain

I’ve only had this Celeron M for about a week now, but I’ve already put four different distros on it, eradicated half of those again, reconfigured, tweaked and wiggled it so many times I almost lost track.

Now it is living out its existence as a remote media player. And it seems well suited to the task. :)

I did find a pair of screenshots from late last week though, showing a clean boot in both Linux Mint 10 and Linux Mint Debian Edition 201012, on that same machine.


Linux Mint Debian, left, and Linux Mint

Not surprisingly, the Debian version of Mint comes in a full 30Mb lower on the startup, taking into account both the screenshot tool and the system monitor there.

Whatever heft is added to Ubuntu when it leaves Debian is inherited in Mint, but to be fair there are a lot of twists and turns in the road from Debian to Ubuntu and Debian to LMDE.

It does beg the question though, at least from my point of view: What’s the advantage in using the Ubuntu rendition, if LMDE comes in lighter at the startup?

And is, presumably, lighter throughout … ? :|

About these ads

10 Responses to “Mint vs. LMDE: Sudden weight gain”

  1. 1 anon 2011/01/03 at 8:06 PM

    Personally I thought it would be the extra crap added to Sid, but suprsingly not. Looks like I can probably upgrade from lenny without bloat.

  2. 2 darkduck 2011/01/04 at 7:52 AM

    The difference between LMDE and Mint is the same as between Debian and Ubuntu. Mint team simply puts their additional wrapper to what other teams have done to make interface user-friendly.
    I tried both LMDE and Mint on my machines. Debian does not support my hardware (including WiFi and LAN cards) on newer laptop, while latest Mint works fine there. That’s because Debian (and LMDE) use older version of kernel and set of drivers.
    BTW… LMDE can take less resources while running, but distro itself weights more, it is not intended for CD, only for DVD.
    Please read more in my blog…

  3. 3 lefty.crupps 2011/01/04 at 10:40 PM

    > It does beg the question though, at least from my point
    > of view: What’s the advantage in using the Ubuntu
    > rendition, if LMDE comes in lighter at the startup?
    > And is, presumably, lighter throughout … ?

    I’ve wondered that as well, for years now, but people seem to be stuck on *buntu for whoknowswhat reasons. Marketing is part of it, and the default packages and closed drivers is another part I am sure.

  4. 4 GAW 2011/01/05 at 11:22 PM

    I can give you an example of why I prefer a “buntu”.

    I was evaluating Crunchbang “Statler” which is based on Debian Testing. My system uses an Nvidia video card and I use the proprietary driver. When Crunchbang did a kernel upgrade and I rebooted I was dumped to the command line. If I was less computer literate, I would need to figure out what is wrong.

    “buntu” handles this upgrade scenario without user interaction. I can get a kernel upgrade, reboot, and get back to work. Debian could choose to do the simple proprietary video driver reinstall but doesn’t.

    I’ll chose losing 30MB of memory with a user friendly OS. Just my $0.02.

  5. 5 jorge 2011/01/06 at 11:34 AM

    From those screenshots, I see the increase of going from using 27.6% of available ram to 33.5%, but that is nothing compared to the shift in cpu usage from 13.9% to 52.6%!
    What gives?

  6. 6 riazm 2011/01/09 at 12:31 AM

    Or it asks the question, why bother with LMDE if the only difference is 30mb?

  7. 8 technologyunit 2011/01/14 at 10:13 AM

    I actually Wrote about this a few days ago on my personal blog perhaps you saw the article or you were just in a common mind set. Anyway I just thought that was a little amusing.

    Some might say that Debian is purer than Ubuntu, but I disagree, As I said in my article Ubuntu was almost assured to evolve faster than Debian because it facilitated a new release every six months. Thus the expected inovation is significantly higher over a two year period than for Debian.

    As for another idea have you played with LibreOffice? Their are alot of people writing about it, or rather reposting an install guide, but what do you think of it. It seems to be a little more polished but beware its a pain to get back on OpenOffice.


    • 9 pankromatic 2011/01/29 at 4:46 AM

      We will see where Ubuntu leads us.

      I am not sure that a new relase every six months or a year is much guarantee of innovation.

      For a different perspective, try aptosid.

      Keep up the good work

  1. 1 Links 3/1/2011: KOffice 2.3.0 Released, New View for Activity Journal | Techrights Trackback on 2011/01/04 at 8:04 AM

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Visit the Wiki!

Some recent desktops

May 6, 2011
Musca 0.9.24 on Crux Linux
150Mhz Pentium 96Mb 8Gb CF

May 14, 2011
IceWM 1.2.37 and Arch Linux
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Some recent games

Apr. 21, 2011
Oolite on Xubuntu 11.04
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 405 other followers


This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blog Stats

  • 3,963,317 hits



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: