<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The short stack</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The also-rans &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The also-rans &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 23:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]   Published 2010/09/26   Linux Leave a&#160;Comment       I&#8217;ve mentioned a few candidates for the 150Mhz, 32Mb machine, which I keep on hand to deliberately confound with software written [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]   Published 2010/09/26   Linux Leave a&nbsp;Comment       I&#8217;ve mentioned a few candidates for the 150Mhz, 32Mb machine, which I keep on hand to deliberately confound with software written [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theo</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45439</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 06:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@LM, there are newer versions of INX in the &#039;devel&#039; section. The last time I looked the latest was an Alpha version of Lucid.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@LM, there are newer versions of INX in the &#8216;devel&#8217; section. The last time I looked the latest was an Alpha version of Lucid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Mandla</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45387</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K.Mandla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45387</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the notes, LM. I&#039;ve tried INX and liked it a lot; I actually  stole their installer script a couple of years ago to use with my own  rotten little live CD. :twisted: 

I do like Tiny Core, but last time I checked it was a bit difficult to get  online with something like a PCMCIA wireless card. I&#039;ll check again  though. 

I really want to get into the BSDs, but the issue I face is time, really.  I&#039;ll have to look into the emulation layer though; that could solve some  problems for me. 

Thanks! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the notes, LM. I&#8217;ve tried INX and liked it a lot; I actually  stole their installer script a couple of years ago to use with my own  rotten little live CD. <img src='http://s2.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_twisted.gif' alt=':twisted:' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I do like Tiny Core, but last time I checked it was a bit difficult to get  online with something like a PCMCIA wireless card. I&#8217;ll check again  though. </p>
<p>I really want to get into the BSDs, but the issue I face is time, really.  I&#8217;ll have to look into the emulation layer though; that could solve some  problems for me. </p>
<p>Thanks! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45385</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s INX (http://inx.maincontent.net/) if you want to try out a text based version of Ubuntu, but it&#039;s not the latest version.  I keep seeing a lot of recommendations for Tiny Core Linux, but I haven&#039;t tried it myself because it says some hardware not completely supported.  I keep wondering how FreeBSD stacks up against the various versions of Linux on lower resource systems.  I&#039;d love to see some statistics and comparisons.  I found video playback faster on FreeBSD, but I was comparing programs that run using X Windows.  Maybe a framebuffer solution for playing videos would be faster on Linux and FreeBSD doesn&#039;t appear to have good support for the framebuffer.  I&#039;ve also been experimenting with FreeBSD&#039;s Linux emulation layer.  You can take programs built for a Linux machine such as Debian and if you copy all supporting libraries over some of them will run on FreeBSD as well.  Might make a good solution for sharing compiled software across different machines.

Look forward to hearing the results of your investigations.  I&#039;m currently debating on whether to try another Linux distribution on my own laptop or leave FreeBSD on it.  Will be interested to see what operating systems/distributions still work in 32 MB RAM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s INX (<a href="http://inx.maincontent.net/" rel="nofollow">http://inx.maincontent.net/</a>) if you want to try out a text based version of Ubuntu, but it&#8217;s not the latest version.  I keep seeing a lot of recommendations for Tiny Core Linux, but I haven&#8217;t tried it myself because it says some hardware not completely supported.  I keep wondering how FreeBSD stacks up against the various versions of Linux on lower resource systems.  I&#8217;d love to see some statistics and comparisons.  I found video playback faster on FreeBSD, but I was comparing programs that run using X Windows.  Maybe a framebuffer solution for playing videos would be faster on Linux and FreeBSD doesn&#8217;t appear to have good support for the framebuffer.  I&#8217;ve also been experimenting with FreeBSD&#8217;s Linux emulation layer.  You can take programs built for a Linux machine such as Debian and if you copy all supporting libraries over some of them will run on FreeBSD as well.  Might make a good solution for sharing compiled software across different machines.</p>
<p>Look forward to hearing the results of your investigations.  I&#8217;m currently debating on whether to try another Linux distribution on my own laptop or leave FreeBSD on it.  Will be interested to see what operating systems/distributions still work in 32 MB RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 14/9/2010: Linux Graphics Survey Results, KDE 4.5 Reflections &#124; Techrights</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45370</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 14/9/2010: Linux Graphics Survey Results, KDE 4.5 Reflections &#124; Techrights]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The short stack [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The short stack [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calvin</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I heard, the minimal installer refuses to start on 64 MB, so no.

I can get the netinst for Debian 5 to start on 64 MB though, but I have a fear of the partitioner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I heard, the minimal installer refuses to start on 64 MB, so no.</p>
<p>I can get the netinst for Debian 5 to start on 64 MB though, but I have a fear of the partitioner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrreality</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mrreality]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 07:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/09/13/the-short-stack/#comment-45353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey k i have been messing round with different puppys on my Toshiba satellite 2535cds is seems to prefer tuxxx&#039;s 214 retro
http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=42553&amp;search_id=2021200104]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey k i have been messing round with different puppys on my Toshiba satellite 2535cds is seems to prefer tuxxx&#8217;s 214 retro<br />
<a href="http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=42553&#038;search_id=2021200104" rel="nofollow">http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=42553&#038;search_id=2021200104</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
