<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reports from the home counties</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: quigybo</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/#comment-44740</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[quigybo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/#comment-44740</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I still think that it is only a matter of time before a proper GUI frontend using libalpm comes along, I agree with x33a that using Arch requires a little bit of knowledge and enthousiasm in maintaining it through the many updates. I always review what is being installed, and if anything interesting comes up, either as a post install message, new version of an important package or new dependencies, I double check that everything is ok afterwards. That and a quick look at the Arch news feed to see if there are any notices there. 

My point is that, while I prefer Arch for my own system, I still recommend one of the more &#039;user friendly&#039; distros for linux newcomers. Rolling release has many advantages, &#039;newcomer friendly&#039; is not one of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I still think that it is only a matter of time before a proper GUI frontend using libalpm comes along, I agree with x33a that using Arch requires a little bit of knowledge and enthousiasm in maintaining it through the many updates. I always review what is being installed, and if anything interesting comes up, either as a post install message, new version of an important package or new dependencies, I double check that everything is ok afterwards. That and a quick look at the Arch news feed to see if there are any notices there. </p>
<p>My point is that, while I prefer Arch for my own system, I still recommend one of the more &#8216;user friendly&#8217; distros for linux newcomers. Rolling release has many advantages, &#8216;newcomer friendly&#8217; is not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: x33a</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/#comment-44623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[x33a]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 03:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/reports-from-the-home-counties/#comment-44623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a graphical frontend to pacman is good for the less experienced. but as you must already know, pacman is not a fire and forget type of package manager as compared to apt or yum, and so upgrading the system can be problematic sometimes.

Hence, i would never put arch on the computer of a linux newbie.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a graphical frontend to pacman is good for the less experienced. but as you must already know, pacman is not a fire and forget type of package manager as compared to apt or yum, and so upgrading the system can be problematic sometimes.</p>
<p>Hence, i would never put arch on the computer of a linux newbie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
