<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 9.10 at 120Mhz, 80Mb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not particularly worried &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-43666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Not particularly worried &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 22:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-43666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] really, I&#8217;ve installed Ubuntu in earlier releases on the same machine, and the results are likewise &#8220;meager&#8221; or &#8220;mild.&#8221; Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] really, I&#8217;ve installed Ubuntu in earlier releases on the same machine, and the results are likewise &#8220;meager&#8221; or &#8220;mild.&#8221; Ubuntu doesn&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Windows XP-ish Debian at 120Mhz &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41749</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Windows XP-ish Debian at 120Mhz &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 23:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] will be my next step, as soon as I get done typing this. Adding memory was liberating for this machine in the sense that it opened the choice of distros quite a bit. But after that, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] will be my next step, as soon as I get done typing this. Adding memory was liberating for this machine in the sense that it opened the choice of distros quite a bit. But after that, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 17/1/2010: New Pardus, Puredyne GNU/Linux &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41684</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Links 17/1/2010: New Pardus, Puredyne GNU/Linux &#124; Boycott Novell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 03:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ubuntu 9.10 at 120Mhz, 80Mb Ordinarily Ubuntu and Debian won’t even install on 16Mb of memory — the installer program (yes, even the floppy-based installer program) crashes and burns without 32Mb of memory. In fact, neither OS will even boot without 20-30Mb of memory, regardless of how you get the system on there. (It’s always possible that different architectures have different memory demands; perhaps a different machine could boot on less.) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ubuntu 9.10 at 120Mhz, 80Mb Ordinarily Ubuntu and Debian won’t even install on 16Mb of memory — the installer program (yes, even the floppy-based installer program) crashes and burns without 32Mb of memory. In fact, neither OS will even boot without 20-30Mb of memory, regardless of how you get the system on there. (It’s always possible that different architectures have different memory demands; perhaps a different machine could boot on less.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtorrent demands on very old hardware &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rtorrent demands on very old hardware &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 00:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] with 80Mb of memory. Here&#8217;s a little picture of rtorrent with htop running alongside it in Ubuntu 9.10, so you can get a mental picture of what&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with 80Mb of memory. Here&#8217;s a little picture of rtorrent with htop running alongside it in Ubuntu 9.10, so you can get a mental picture of what&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Blackwood</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41667</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Blackwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 22:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2010/01/16/ubuntu-9-10-at-120mhz-80mb/#comment-41667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.delilinux.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Deli Linux&lt;/a&gt; is supposed to install with 8 Megs of ram from what I have read.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.delilinux.org/" rel="nofollow">Deli Linux</a> is supposed to install with 8 Megs of ram from what I have read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
