Six months without X

I had to check back against the calendar, but if my calculations are right, it’s been about six months since I tossed X overboard on my Thinkpad. I won’t bore you with a bunch of anti-X rantings because I have spewed forth plenty of anti-X rantings in the past.

And because it would be slightly hypocritical, in a technical way. For as much as I run X-less, I also rely on X (albeit a year-old version) to keep this Pentium afloat. Sure, it can run without it — all the applications are the same. But because the hardware predates the VESA requirements in recent kernels, there’s not much fun to be had with the framebuffer.

But that too is old news, really. Xorg 7.3 is a great substitute for the lack of framebuffer support here, but given the choice on a machine this old, I’d definitely drop it like a hot rock.

And why? Mostly because it returns a large slice of your system resources to you — although that argument is a bit weak, considering I’m talking about a Pentium with 16Mb in it.

But also because everything moves quicker, snappier and just plain faster without X as an intermediary layer. I’ve discovered quite a few things that make things faster over the past few years, but the best results seem to come from taking things out. And X is one of those.

I promised not to rant, and it seems already I did. If you haven’t tried life without X I recommend it, just for a little while. I can’t predict with any certainty that you’ll get hooked, but if you’re one of the lucky ones, life will certainly get better.

About these ads

4 Responses to “Six months without X”

  1. 1 Jeff Flowers 2009/09/01 at 9:52 AM

    On a command line system, what would you use to keep a database of books? I have a collection I want to manage but I can’t decide what to use.

    • 2 K.Mandla 2009/09/02 at 6:55 AM

      To be honest, I’m not sure. I’ll keep my eyes open. I can’t say that I’ve seen many CLI applications that use databases, but it seems like the few that I remember rely on outside structures to maintain them.

    • 3 Eric Fraga 2009/09/09 at 6:06 AM

      At the risk of getting shot down (due to potentially large memory requirements), you could use Emacs with its database mode?

  2. 4 Jeff Flowers 2009/09/03 at 3:58 AM

    I’ve been looking into it. I briefly considered using a SQL server, like MySQL or PostgreSQL, but that would seem to be overkill, so I am considering building my database with Awk or SQLite.

    Either way, I am going to be learning something new, as I am not real familiar with either Awk or SQL.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Visit the Wiki!

Some recent desktops

May 6, 2011
Musca 0.9.24 on Crux Linux
150Mhz Pentium 96Mb 8Gb CF

May 14, 2011
IceWM 1.2.37 and Arch Linux
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Some recent games

Apr. 21, 2011
Oolite on Xubuntu 11.04
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 405 other followers


This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blog Stats

  • 3,959,123 hits



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: