Comments on: Light and efficient, at under 10Kb http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/ K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Seven in a row « Motho ke motho ka botho http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-48638 Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:02:50 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-48638 [...] more unusual ones I find — that, after all, is my gimmick. I’ve mentioned e3 in the past; here it is again along with mg, joe and [...]

]]> By: RevAaron http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-46587 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:06:53 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-46587 It’s easy enough to see if its code size is 10K, no need for any “if Wikipedia is to be believed…” FUD. Go to the e3 site, download the tarball, and ls -lh will tell you all you need to know. The code is quite a bit larger than 10K, though the 32-bit Linux binary is 13K. I didn’t look at all of the binaries, but the 16 bit DOS binary might be 10K, but it is more limited in features.

Just FYI…

]]> By: At long last: A look at vifm « Motho ke motho ka botho http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-42574 Tue, 06 Apr 2010 00:33:17 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-42574 [...] easiest on the new people. I even have a handle on some of the more obscure editors, like joe or e3 or even some built-in editors in other [...]

]]> By: Musca and e3, with space left over « Motho ke motho ka botho http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40882 Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:01:39 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40882 [...] new/old laptop, I have shifted gears slightly, and installed two of my own suggestions: Musca and e3. You can see Musca running in this screenshot, but e3 is not there; that’s because it really [...]

]]> By: K.Mandla http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40467 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:39:59 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40467 Yup, I can’t be sure why though. Maybe you can skim back through the page history, if it’s still there. Not like it had much to say, really. … :roll:

]]> By: sector http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40453 Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:01:18 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-40453 e3 @ wikipedia -> dead.
Article removed.

]]> By: éric http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39828 Sun, 12 Jul 2009 19:22:40 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39828 You could always consider ant, one of the winners of the Obfuscated C contest from way back in 1991!

Link: http://www.ioccc.org/years-spoiler.html#1991

]]> By: Mikko http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39803 Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:35:36 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39803 Thank you for your friendly words!

]]> By: colonelcrayon http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39757 Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:25:54 +0000 http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/light-and-efficient-at-under-10kb/#comment-39757 e3 was suggested to me a while ago, and I love it. e3vi mimics vim keybindings pretty well and works perfectly for what I need.

]]>