Flabbergasted

Ubuntu LinuxI don’t intend to sound jaded or know-it-all, but it’s unusual that anything in the Linux world should surprise me. By that I mean that I have expectations for certain software and certain distros, and thus far in my relatively short experience with Linux, everything can be comfortably cubbyholed.

Ubuntu is full-featured but kind of slow. Fedora is the same, as are most of the other well-rounded distributions. Arch is fast, and lets you control your system down to the minute detail. Crux is brutally honest, as other source-based distros probably are. Ultralightweights like Slitaz, Puppy and Tiny Core are so bewilderingly fast as to defy logic.

That’s just what I’ve learned as life has gone on, and what I’ve come to expect. No harm in that. No danger in having expectations.

Except that occasionally somebody in that list above steps out of their box, and I’m left struggling to understand how it’s possible. This time, it’s Ubuntu that has me scratching my head, and questioning my personal belief system.

For some reason, through some sort of arcane technological magic, my Ubuntu 9.04 system boots in under a minute.

The hardware is this machine, the same one I have been using since early 2006 when I realized Linux was going to save me thousands of dollars in hardware upgrades demanded by Redmond. One gigahertz, a 7200rpm 60Gb system drive, 512Mb of PC133, a ground-level Nvidia card and a decent wireless card.

Up until now, I had a hard time getting Ubuntu to boot in under three minutes. In fact, about a year ago when I still had a 2Ghz machine, three minutes was still the best I could do. And the only way to get Gnome to finish loading any faster was to put together a custom kernel, and inject that into it’s electronic heart, like epinephrin.

So I have no explanation. I built a system with the desktop ISO, I installed the full Ubuntu Gnome suite, and I used ext4, just for a change.

Aha, maybe that’s it.

I had heard ext4 was yielding some speed increases, but I’d also heard the opposite — that it was dragging down older systems and making them unresponsive. The obvious corollary was that, like many things, ext4 was probably best on newer, higher-end hardware.

But this sub-one-minute-booting machine is nothing short of a shocker. I measured it three or four times, and every time it’s ducking in under the 1 minute mark.

And that’s when the drive light stops, not when the cursor appears. I dislike that the startup sound plays and the system appears ready before it actually can do anything — that’s an old Windows trick that doesn’t fool me — but I can’t find fault since it’s only another eight or nine seconds before the entire system is ready.

So there it is. Finally, an Ubuntu system that can put Gnome in my face in less than a minute from the Grub bootloader. Somebody out there deserves a gold smilie: :D

About these ads

8 Responses to “Flabbergasted”


  1. 1 Michael Douglas 2009/04/29 at 8:50 AM

    They worked a LOT on making the boot better. And, if I’m honest, more was gained by the kernel (2.6.28) than by ext4. 2.6.28 is a LOT better than .27 (and .29 is better yet :D) so that’s where a big chuck of change came from.

    Also: 512MB of RAM should be enough for a full Gnome Desktop too so, while Ubuntu is bloated (I use the more minimalist Crunchbang) it should still be responsive enough.

    Says the person who spent the day working why on earth his 333MHz rated Cyrix M-II powered machine wouldn’t let Linux install on it. Still no clue what was wrong, but I solved it. ;) (See my latest blog, linked to as my website, for details.)

    Also, it has come to my attention (e.g. pointed out to me) that, on your sidebar, you refer to it as “Mb” not “MB”, which is technically inaccurate (well, unless you count your RAM in Megabits, not MegaBytes ;)

  2. 3 Sam Weston 2009/04/29 at 4:24 PM

    Indeed, 9.04 is a bit insane when it comes to boot times. It boots significantly faster on my laptop than the arch with openbox install I had on it until a couple of days ago. Agreed, this may be partially down to ext4 but I think they must also have made some big optimisations to the boot scripts etc.

  3. 4 wakizaki 2009/04/29 at 8:48 PM

    It’s the tweaks at the boot scripts, one can experience the fast bootups even on non-ext4 filesystems.

  4. 7 Xew 2009/05/01 at 1:51 PM

    Oh god. You’re very much tempting me to upgrade to jaunty. Deep down, I know that an upgrade would be a pain in the butt, but under a minute? wow. I may have to risk it.

    How I wish Ubuntu was rolling like arch.

    • 8 K.Mandla 2009/05/01 at 3:34 PM

      C’mon. All the cool kids are doing it. :twisted:

      In my unprofessional opinion, an upgrade would be more hassle than it would be worth. Start with a clean installation, and you’ll be more impressed. :)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Welcome!



Visit the Wiki!

Some recent desktops


May 6, 2011
Musca 0.9.24 on Crux Linux
150Mhz Pentium 96Mb 8Gb CF
 


May 14, 2011
IceWM 1.2.37 and Arch Linux
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Some recent games


Apr. 21, 2011
Oolite on Xubuntu 11.04
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 405 other followers

License

This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blog Stats

  • 3,963,198 hits

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: