<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To do: data=journal in ext3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/to-do-datajournal-in-ext3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/to-do-datajournal-in-ext3/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ext3 with data=journal results &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/to-do-datajournal-in-ext3/#comment-37037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ext3 with data=journal results &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 05:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/?p=1224#comment-37037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Ubuntu installation identical to the one I built for the Hardy speed guide, but this time I used data=journal as a flag for the default ext3 filesystem. Boot time results were a second slower than a clean [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ubuntu installation identical to the one I built for the Hardy speed guide, but this time I used data=journal as a flag for the default ext3 filesystem. Boot time results were a second slower than a clean [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Mandla</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/to-do-datajournal-in-ext3/#comment-36933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K.Mandla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/?p=1224#comment-36933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s good to know. I&#039;ll give it a try this weekend and see what happens. It might be oversimplifying things, but personally I&#039;m only interested in desktop performance, for simple things like starting up and opening a browser. If the benefits appear only at particular times or during particular workloads, I&#039;m not as interested.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good to know. I&#8217;ll give it a try this weekend and see what happens. It might be oversimplifying things, but personally I&#8217;m only interested in desktop performance, for simple things like starting up and opening a browser. If the benefits appear only at particular times or during particular workloads, I&#8217;m not as interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reacocard</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/08/18/to-do-datajournal-in-ext3/#comment-36927</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reacocard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/?p=1224#comment-36927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It does in fact improve interactive performance, I&#039;ve tried it myself on both arch and ubuntu with a recent computer (core 2, 2GB). However, as you expect raw I/O performance is NOT increased, instead it is drastically decreased, to around 1/2 of its normal value. However, for most tasks this difference is overshadowed by the interactive benefit obtained. I didn&#039;t notice any significant change in boot times, maybe 1-2 seconds, but file copying was much slower. On the other hand, no matter how much file activity was going on applications remained completely responsive, unlike with normal ext3. Its worth a try if you don&#039;t frequently need to work with large files.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does in fact improve interactive performance, I&#8217;ve tried it myself on both arch and ubuntu with a recent computer (core 2, 2GB). However, as you expect raw I/O performance is NOT increased, instead it is drastically decreased, to around 1/2 of its normal value. However, for most tasks this difference is overshadowed by the interactive benefit obtained. I didn&#8217;t notice any significant change in boot times, maybe 1-2 seconds, but file copying was much slower. On the other hand, no matter how much file activity was going on applications remained completely responsive, unlike with normal ext3. Its worth a try if you don&#8217;t frequently need to work with large files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
