Arch vs. Crux

I find myself the oblique topic of discussion on the Arch forums recently. Although I guess the real issue is a comparison between Arch and Crux, so I’ll stop flattering myself. :roll:

I don’t have anything to add to the debate that I didn’t tack on to the end of the thread, so if you’re debating trying one or the other, you might skim through the pros and cons. If you’re a Crux user you’ll no doubt appreciate the immense load of precompiled software available to you. And of course if you’re an Arch user you might find the similar structure and sparse setup to your liking.

In the end, it’s all the same flavor, friends. Linux is Linux, I always say. Use what you like, and you’ll be happy. :mrgreen:

About these ads

5 Responses to “Arch vs. Crux”

  1. 1 CoarseSand 2008/08/06 at 4:13 PM

    Nah, we were really talking about you. :D And consider yourself flattered as this is one of two Linux blogs I actually keep in my RSS feed. You have some of the most interesting articles on low resource use systems every Arch user seems to love tinkering with.

    Actually, this reminds me of another topic. I know you use sakura as your terminal, but what are your thoughts on the alternatives like Xfce4 Terminal, termit and my brand new favorite, ROXTerm? Sakura used a little less memory in my very brief tests, but CPU time use on ROXTerm and sakura are almost identical.

  2. 2 K.Mandla 2008/08/06 at 4:39 PM

    I’ll have to try termit and ROXTerm; I hadn’t heard of those yet.

    I started out with xfce4′s Terminal and liked it quite a bit. At the time I thought it was fun because it could be undecorated completely, and do pseudotransparency. I moved to rxvt-unicode because it was lighter, and could do the same things in conjunction with Openbox.

    I stick with Sakura now just because I like that it’s tabbable (is that a word?) and follows the GTK2 theme. I find it to be complimentary, really.

    I’ll see if I can mess with the others you mentioned. I’m always on the hunt for new software. :twisted:

  3. 3 Jeff Flowers 2008/08/06 at 9:35 PM

    Interesting post. I’ve played with just about every BSD and Linux distro but I have yet to try Crux a try. I may have to change that, as I do enjoy using minimalistic operating systems.

    Looking through the documentation on Crux, the only program that I would use that might be daunting to install is Firefox, which has a bunch of dependencies. How do you go about installing FF?

  4. 5 yangsayang 2008/08/07 at 9:36 AM

    Do you have recommendation to easy self-compiling Linux manual / documentation for newbie like me?
    Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


Visit the Wiki!

Some recent desktops

May 6, 2011
Musca 0.9.24 on Crux Linux
150Mhz Pentium 96Mb 8Gb CF

May 14, 2011
IceWM 1.2.37 and Arch Linux
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Some recent games

Apr. 21, 2011
Oolite on Xubuntu 11.04
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 405 other followers


This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blog Stats

  • 3,959,958 hits



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: