Hardy beta on a diet

After slogging through a full installation of the Hardy beta on the ugly little laptop, I reversed direction and installed only the sparser side of Ubuntu. The goal, of course, is to collect some benchmarks for future performance guides.

Start times to a pure Openbox system are around 1:40 with an autologin script, with shutdown in 14 seconds from the terminal prompt. Those are acceptable, but this machine is capable of much better performance.

So far, Hardy without Gnome seems to be performing about the same for me as its predecessors, with the odd exception that it seems to take up quite a bit more space. A pure command-line installation seems to need about 700Mb, which is quite a bit more than Gutsy, which was on the drive with under 300Mb required.

Of course, for most people, the difference between 700Mb and 300Mb is irrelevant, since the drive is 100 times bigger than that. It just strikes me as odd that the amount reported by df -lha is so much greater than past systems.

This is all still beta of course, so it’s possible that there’s a dependency hooked in there somewhere, that is holding down one or two packages that oughtn’t be included. I’ll be patient and say there’s still time to lose weight before the big day. ;)

(Edit: I just remembered I have ubuntu-restricted-extras installed, so that might be the extra weight. :roll: )

1 Response to “Hardy beta on a diet”


  1. 1 johnraff April 4, 2008 at 1:39 pm

    Indeed, some of the people putting in a command-line install might be on limited disk space…
    I hope they get it slimmed down a bit by the final release.

Leave a Reply




Welcome!

Most recent desktop


May 8, 2008
XFCE 4.4.2 on Crux Linux
750Mhz Celeron 128Mb PC100

Most recent game

Gnome Mahjongg on Debian 550Mhz Celeron 192Mb PC100

Be counted!

License

This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blogs worth watching

Ubuntu Feeds

Blog Stats

  • 597,100 hits

Categories