<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One other small benefit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/one-other-small-benefit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/one-other-small-benefit/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Mandla</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/one-other-small-benefit/#comment-35620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K.Mandla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/?p=862#comment-35620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were a couple of times where I recompiled a vanilla kernel for Arch, and it was a little bit faster than the stock precompiled one. I usually made a point of including all the modules I needed in the kernel itself, the idea being that I wouldn&#039;t have to load any modules on startup.

It helps a lot, but the problem was that I couldn&#039;t get Arch to avoid the udev and module loading steps at the start of its boot. Even though the kernel I made had everything I needed, I still had to go through those steps at startup. That was kind of why I went looking for Crux, since I was recompiling anyway, and didn&#039;t want to take the time to do those things.

I learned which modules I needed and didn&#039;t need mostly from the kernel source help files and from Google -- and from a lot of experimentation. If you have a fast machine you can afford to make mistakes too, so trial-and-error isn&#039;t so bad.

By the way, if you recompile a few kernels for Arch and they work for you, you should be able to handle Crux with no difficulty ... aside from waiting for software to install. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were a couple of times where I recompiled a vanilla kernel for Arch, and it was a little bit faster than the stock precompiled one. I usually made a point of including all the modules I needed in the kernel itself, the idea being that I wouldn&#8217;t have to load any modules on startup.</p>
<p>It helps a lot, but the problem was that I couldn&#8217;t get Arch to avoid the udev and module loading steps at the start of its boot. Even though the kernel I made had everything I needed, I still had to go through those steps at startup. That was kind of why I went looking for Crux, since I was recompiling anyway, and didn&#8217;t want to take the time to do those things.</p>
<p>I learned which modules I needed and didn&#8217;t need mostly from the kernel source help files and from Google &#8212; and from a lot of experimentation. If you have a fast machine you can afford to make mistakes too, so trial-and-error isn&#8217;t so bad.</p>
<p>By the way, if you recompile a few kernels for Arch and they work for you, you should be able to handle Crux with no difficulty &#8230; aside from waiting for software to install. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: elmariachi</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2008/03/09/one-other-small-benefit/#comment-35618</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[elmariachi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:20:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/?p=862#comment-35618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey K.Mandla.

I&#039;m too busy (and scared, honestly) to try Crux and I&#039;m also way too happy with Arch to adventure myself into another distro.
Even so I want my computer to run faster (not that it isn&#039;t faster now).

Something is funny though... I&#039;m still dual booting WinXp and, since it&#039;s almost at fresh install state, it has a super fast boot - yeah we all know that only lasts the first week of REAL usage of that OS, but still....

I want to make Arch boot even faster. Can that be achieved with the default Kernel? I only have the modules I need loading, but there must be a lot more that can be trimmed. How can I learn this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey K.Mandla.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m too busy (and scared, honestly) to try Crux and I&#8217;m also way too happy with Arch to adventure myself into another distro.<br />
Even so I want my computer to run faster (not that it isn&#8217;t faster now).</p>
<p>Something is funny though&#8230; I&#8217;m still dual booting WinXp and, since it&#8217;s almost at fresh install state, it has a super fast boot &#8211; yeah we all know that only lasts the first week of REAL usage of that OS, but still&#8230;.</p>
<p>I want to make Arch boot even faster. Can that be achieved with the default Kernel? I only have the modules I need loading, but there must be a lot more that can be trimmed. How can I learn this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
