Reflections after two weeks

This will be an unexpected coda for the ugly little laptop, which, until Sunday night, I had planned to use as a guinea pig for Gutsy. However, the ascent of the Thinkpad marks the decline of the Sotec … and to be honest, I don’t think it will be missed.

It always makes me sad to see a abused computer, usually because they can be salvaged or refurbished. And the Sotec was a poster child for neglected hardware. It really should have been a top-notch, still-in-use machine because — with the exception of aesthetic flaws — there wasn’t anything that warranted its retirement.

Regardless, here’s what I learned from the ugly little laptop.

First, BIOS settings made a huge difference on that machine. It might be a quirk of the system or the version of the BIOS, but turning off any and all power management kept it from trying to scale back when there wasn’t any point to scaling back (it was an AC-only machine). And that had an enormous impact on system performance.

It’s also worth noting that the BIOS offered a strange filesystem option, switching between Windows-based operating systems and “Other”. Setting it to “Other” seemed to kick it to the Grub bootloader faster, but had no real effect after that point. Keeping it on “Other” with XP installed made the system unbootable. Curiouser and curiouser.

Video memory was the strongest impediment to a reasonable system; I believe that card used 2Mb of shared memory, but I could be wrong. Redraws were choppy, slow and stuttery at best resolution — 1024x768x16. That made the desktop a challenge to keep perky, since just scrolling a page in Kazehakase could make other processes (like Audacious) skip.

The only acceptable solution to that was to incorporate lighter, GTK1.2 software — like Dillo and XMMS instead of Kazehakase and Audacious — and try not to overwhelm the entire system. Doing that kept the system usable and enjoyable, as long I didn’t bog it down. And that, of course, is the golden rule for working with any outdated hardware.

I had a couple of unusual observations that were specific to that machine. First, the fans never shut off. That, along with the racket of a 4200rpm hard drive, made it a noisy machine. I solved part of that by using a faster, quieter drive, but short of replacing the fans in it, I don’t know if there was a way to shut it up completely. I guess noisy is just the way it is.

And this is an exceptionally esoteric point, but the “g,” “k” and right cursor keys were all flaky. When your username has a “k” in it and you password has a “g” and a “k” … well, that was the worst possible combination for me. If it had actually been my laptop, I would have replaced the keyboard before anything else.

Finally, for me, the distro winners were Wolvix and AntiX, with scattered second place finishers. Ubuntulite gets a tip of the hat too, while Lowarch gets a nod for being the fastest of the bunch, although it’s abandoned and out-of-date, which unfortunately disqualifies it.

I think that’s about it. It was an interesting experience and given the chance I might give it a home, but otherwise I’m willing to close the book on it. It wasn’t a great computer, but it could be, if given the chance.

About these ads

6 Responses to “Reflections after two weeks”


  1. 1 magdalen0 2007/09/25 at 11:17 PM

    very nice experiments ;)

  2. 2 magdalen0 2007/09/25 at 11:20 PM

    just a question a little bit out-of-topic.

    what do you think about fluxbox?

    and fluxbuntu?

  3. 3 K.Mandla 2007/09/26 at 8:19 AM

    Actually, I really like Fluxbox. I just don’t like it as much as Openbox. ;) I think it does a really great job handling light and fast systems. But for some reason, I just prefer OB.

    I’ve been watching Fluxbuntu for a long time and I liked the direction it was going, but it seems to have stalled for a little while. That worries me that it might not develop through Gutsy, which puts it in the “dead” category to me.

    Some of the people on the project have assured me that it’s not dead, just dormant, but I have my doubts.

  4. 4 magdalen0 2007/09/26 at 9:27 PM

    i understand and thank you for the answer.

    and i wanna ask you something else. here we go:

    if i install ubuntu and fluxbox after that (i dont really need speed, i’ve got a nice computer) its ok?

  5. 5 K.Mandla 2007/09/26 at 11:10 PM

    Sure. If you install Fluxbox after installing Ubuntu, you just need to pick it as the window manager when you log in. Look for the “Sessions” button on the login page, and if I remember right, Fluxbox should be an option there.

  6. 6 magdalen0 2007/09/26 at 11:57 PM

    is what i do. i mean. i already have it like my default windows manager.

    here you can see my desk ;)

    http://i100.photobucket.com/albums/m26/axelmarazzi/minimal.jpg

    the last post is hopefull. ill try it in 24 days :)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Welcome!



Visit the Wiki!

Some recent desktops


May 6, 2011
Musca 0.9.24 on Crux Linux
150Mhz Pentium 96Mb 8Gb CF
 


May 14, 2011
IceWM 1.2.37 and Arch Linux
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Some recent games


Apr. 21, 2011
Oolite on Xubuntu 11.04
L2300 core duo 3Gb 320Gb

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

Join 405 other followers

License

This work is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. Please see the About page for details.

Blog Stats

  • 3,963,355 hits

Archives


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 405 other followers

%d bloggers like this: