<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 7.04 on a 450Mhz K6-2, 256Mb</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 18:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Expected and unexpected &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-35832</link>
		<dc:creator>Expected and unexpected &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 22:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-35832</guid>
		<description>[...] startup seems faster &#8212; I&#8217;m reaching the login in under 2.5 minutes, which is a big jump compared to 7.04. And of course, Firefox 3 is faster than version 2, an opinion that seems to be shared by almost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] startup seems faster &#8212; I&#8217;m reaching the login in under 2.5 minutes, which is a big jump compared to 7.04. And of course, Firefox 3 is faster than version 2, an opinion that seems to be shared by almost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maybe it just takes three minutes &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-35677</link>
		<dc:creator>Maybe it just takes three minutes &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-35677</guid>
		<description>[...] still &#8230; 3 minutes?! That&#8217;s terrible. That&#8217;s 450Mhz behavior. The first few times I started the machine, I assumed something was wrong and began whacking the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still &#8230; 3 minutes?! That&#8217;s terrible. That&#8217;s 450Mhz behavior. The first few times I started the machine, I assumed something was wrong and began whacking the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fluxbuntu 7.10 RC on 450Mhz K6-2, 256Mb &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-28783</link>
		<dc:creator>Fluxbuntu 7.10 RC on 450Mhz K6-2, 256Mb &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-28783</guid>
		<description>[...] than a command-line installation on this system, but shorter than the default Xubuntu 7.04 or Ubuntu 7.04 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] than a command-line installation on this system, but shorter than the default Xubuntu 7.04 or Ubuntu 7.04 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zenwalk 4.6.1 on 450Mhz K6-2, 256Mb &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-19330</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenwalk 4.6.1 on 450Mhz K6-2, 256Mb &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 23:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-19330</guid>
		<description>[...] starting to feel sorry for &#8212; had an awful time running Zenwalk. It wasn&#8217;t as bad as a full Ubuntu installation, but even Xubuntu seemed to have more pep than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] starting to feel sorry for &#8212; had an awful time running Zenwalk. It wasn&#8217;t as bad as a full Ubuntu installation, but even Xubuntu seemed to have more pep than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oxidor</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18976</link>
		<dc:creator>oxidor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18976</guid>
		<description>3 minutes for booting ? that is very slowly...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3 minutes for booting ? that is very slowly&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debianero Follonero</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18960</link>
		<dc:creator>Debianero Follonero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18960</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mike, you'd try Debian Etch.

I've that same machine, K6-2 at 450Mhz, but with 128Mb of RAM and is running flawlessly with Etch and XFCE.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mike, you&#8217;d try Debian Etch.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve that same machine, K6-2 at 450Mhz, but with 128Mb of RAM and is running flawlessly with Etch and XFCE.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18958</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18958</guid>
		<description>You really should try Debian Etch, it's much faster and it uses much less memory than Ubuntu. Debian Etch with Gnome desktop runs just fine on P3@650Mhz laptop with 256MB RAM. After boot only about 100MB ram is in use. And eg. all of these are running: Beagle, NetworkManager, PowerManager, Update-notifier, Glipper, Avahi, PulseAudio etc etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really should try Debian Etch, it&#8217;s much faster and it uses much less memory than Ubuntu. Debian Etch with Gnome desktop runs just fine on P3@650Mhz laptop with 256MB RAM. After boot only about 100MB ram is in use. And eg. all of these are running: Beagle, NetworkManager, PowerManager, Update-notifier, Glipper, Avahi, PulseAudio etc etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alexandru</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18922</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 11:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18922</guid>
		<description>For a faster system, you can try Puppy Linux. Does a good job with hardware detection and is highly customizable (if you don't like the default window manager, which is fast but... you can easily install another one).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a faster system, you can try Puppy Linux. Does a good job with hardware detection and is highly customizable (if you don&#8217;t like the default window manager, which is fast but&#8230; you can easily install another one).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panu</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18900</link>
		<dc:creator>Panu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 07:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/09/05/ubuntu-704-on-a-450mhz-k6-2-256mb/#comment-18900</guid>
		<description>I have tried both kubuntu and xubuntu on P3/600mhz machine and both are awfully slow. only *buntu that managed to run nicely was Fluxbuntu beta that I tried last year. They should come up with full release when Gutsy is released.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried both kubuntu and xubuntu on P3/600mhz machine and both are awfully slow. only *buntu that managed to run nicely was Fluxbuntu beta that I tried last year. They should come up with full release when Gutsy is released.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
