<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An 800Mhz computer IS NOT OLD!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 8.04 might be your best bet &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-44258</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[8.04 might be your best bet &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 02:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-44258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to banish a 2.8Ghz machine to the closet. But people have heard me whine about that for a very, very long time, and whether or not people listen is immaterial any more. I could say you don&#8217;t need a new [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to banish a 2.8Ghz machine to the closet. But people have heard me whine about that for a very, very long time, and whether or not people listen is immaterial any more. I could say you don&#8217;t need a new [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Issues of perspective &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-41610</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Issues of perspective &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-41610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] lies the problem: That&#8217;s not the case any longer. Two years ago when people were ho-humming 800Mhz machines, or last year when Pentium 4s suddenly became &#8220;antiques,&#8221; I felt I had the moral high [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lies the problem: That&#8217;s not the case any longer. Two years ago when people were ho-humming 800Mhz machines, or last year when Pentium 4s suddenly became &#8220;antiques,&#8221; I felt I had the moral high [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair but honest? Xubuntu 8.10 &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-38035</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fair but honest? Xubuntu 8.10 &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 13:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-38035</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] to endorse it as a solution to older computers &#8212; and my definition of &#8220;older&#8221; is well below 800Mhz. Performance is just too weak at the desktop for me to consider it for my personal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to endorse it as a solution to older computers &#8212; and my definition of &#8220;older&#8221; is well below 800Mhz. Performance is just too weak at the desktop for me to consider it for my personal [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: You can&#8217;t fight city hall &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-37115</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[You can&#8217;t fight city hall &#171; Motho ke motho ka botho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-37115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Published September 7, 2008   Hardware , Ubuntu , Ubuntu Forums       About a year and a half ago I ran screaming from the forums because 800Mhz machines were being thrown about and labelled as [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Published September 7, 2008   Hardware , Ubuntu , Ubuntu Forums       About a year and a half ago I ran screaming from the forums because 800Mhz machines were being thrown about and labelled as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 01:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah Enlightenment is pretty darn cool, but it&#039;s REALLY unstable for me.. it crashes almost every time I open the applications menu with a message that says &quot;This is very bad.&quot; lol

I thought I found the perfect match for this computer in installing Zenwalk, but I tried installing XChat from it&#039;s TERRIBLE package manager, only to have it corrupt xorg, so it&#039;s temporarily hosed right now until I find some motivation to get around to fixing it.

I&#039;m using Edgy on my laptop right now, which is my main computer and it runs just fine, but seems to take up alot of ram in comparison to when I&#039;m using say Fluxbuntu on my 566mHz emachine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah Enlightenment is pretty darn cool, but it&#8217;s REALLY unstable for me.. it crashes almost every time I open the applications menu with a message that says &#8220;This is very bad.&#8221; lol</p>
<p>I thought I found the perfect match for this computer in installing Zenwalk, but I tried installing XChat from it&#8217;s TERRIBLE package manager, only to have it corrupt xorg, so it&#8217;s temporarily hosed right now until I find some motivation to get around to fixing it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m using Edgy on my laptop right now, which is my main computer and it runs just fine, but seems to take up alot of ram in comparison to when I&#8217;m using say Fluxbuntu on my 566mHz emachine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[George]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Matt: I&#039;ve found Enlightenment (without all the fancy effects) and IceWM pretty fast. You might want to give those a shot. Enlightenment DR17 is very pretty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt: I&#8217;ve found Enlightenment (without all the fancy effects) and IceWM pretty fast. You might want to give those a shot. Enlightenment DR17 is very pretty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 800 MHz x86 computers are quite powerful.</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-633</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[800 MHz x86 computers are quite powerful.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] power quickly dwindle to below what is offered at the low end at most electronics retailers. I read a short article today which suggested that an 800 MHz Pentium III computer is not old. I have to agree! A system like that is quite [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] power quickly dwindle to below what is offered at the low end at most electronics retailers. I read a short article today which suggested that an 800 MHz Pentium III computer is not old. I have to agree! A system like that is quite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first run at using Ubuntu was on an 800 MHz, PIII machine. It was faster than the 1.1 GHz with Fedora Core 4/5. The deciding factor of switching to Ubuntu was everything actually worked on Ubuntu.

Now, like you, I have fun with the idea of &quot;How long can I keep this machine not just running, but running well?&quot; I wrote an entry about it in my blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first run at using Ubuntu was on an 800 MHz, PIII machine. It was faster than the 1.1 GHz with Fedora Core 4/5. The deciding factor of switching to Ubuntu was everything actually worked on Ubuntu.</p>
<p>Now, like you, I have fun with the idea of &#8220;How long can I keep this machine not just running, but running well?&#8221; I wrote an entry about it in my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K.Mandla</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K.Mandla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Matt. Xubuntu is a good start, but I&#039;m with you when you say it&#039;s not as snappy as it ought to be. It started out as an option for older computers but it has matured to a point that it&#039;s on par with Kubuntu or Ubuntu, in my opinion.

There are a lot of options available; unfortunately a lot of them will require a some setting up. If you want something that&#039;s fast and good looking, try out &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FVWM-Crystal&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;FVWM-Crystal&lt;/a&gt;; if you tried Fluxbox but didn&#039;t care for it, there&#039;s still &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Openbox&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Openbox&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://help.ubuntu.com/community/IceWM&quot; / rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IceWM&lt;/a&gt; that are good starting points.

None of those are a full-fledged desktop, but that&#039;s why they&#039;re so fast. If you want to get things like automounting USB drives going, it will take an extra step to get it going, but the effort is worth it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt. Xubuntu is a good start, but I&#8217;m with you when you say it&#8217;s not as snappy as it ought to be. It started out as an option for older computers but it has matured to a point that it&#8217;s on par with Kubuntu or Ubuntu, in my opinion.</p>
<p>There are a lot of options available; unfortunately a lot of them will require a some setting up. If you want something that&#8217;s fast and good looking, try out <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FVWM-Crystal" / rel="nofollow">FVWM-Crystal</a>; if you tried Fluxbox but didn&#8217;t care for it, there&#8217;s still <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Openbox" / rel="nofollow">Openbox</a> and <a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/IceWM" / rel="nofollow">IceWM</a> that are good starting points.</p>
<p>None of those are a full-fledged desktop, but that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re so fast. If you want to get things like automounting USB drives going, it will take an extra step to get it going, but the effort is worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2007/01/30/an-800mhz-computer-is-not-old/#comment-623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have a computer that&#039;s around 800mHz mark and with 256 megs of ram, but no matter what I do with the thing it never seems to have the snappiness I need.. or want anyway. Right now it&#039;s running Xubuntu Edgy, and that&#039;s decently fast. I&#039;ve tried using fluxbox and other lower end stuff, and even installed fluxbuntu, but it kinda seems like a pain in the butt to have to type a command in the command line to be able to use my usb stick, etc. It&#039;s little things like that. Anyway, I was wondering if you could off the top of your head type a &quot;sudo aptitude install ...&quot; for a decent-looking, fast desktop environment that would be useable on this machine. I&#039;m looking to start over from a base command line install of edgy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a computer that&#8217;s around 800mHz mark and with 256 megs of ram, but no matter what I do with the thing it never seems to have the snappiness I need.. or want anyway. Right now it&#8217;s running Xubuntu Edgy, and that&#8217;s decently fast. I&#8217;ve tried using fluxbox and other lower end stuff, and even installed fluxbuntu, but it kinda seems like a pain in the butt to have to type a command in the command line to be able to use my usb stick, etc. It&#8217;s little things like that. Anyway, I was wondering if you could off the top of your head type a &#8220;sudo aptitude install &#8230;&#8221; for a decent-looking, fast desktop environment that would be useable on this machine. I&#8217;m looking to start over from a base command line install of edgy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
