<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu 6.06.1 on 75Mhz Pentium, 64Mb, 1.5Gb and Openbox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/</link>
	<description>K.Mandla's blog of Linux experiences</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmandla</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kmandla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 05:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/#comment-49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Steve. You&#039;re right; Xubuntu is the lightest full Ubuntu distro you can get as a package. If you want to build up with something sparser, Openbox is an option.

Openbox is a very lightweight desktop environment. In a way it looks a lot like Fluxbox or Blackbox. It uses a lot less resources than Gnome, KDE or even XFCE, but requires a little more effort to set up.  A good place to look at nice Openbox setups is on Boxwhore.org. 

On a machine like that one, you&#039;d probably see some real speed improvements. On the other hand, the time it takes to set it up -- and it&#039;s certainly not very noob-friendly -- might not be worth it to you. Search the forums for Openbox and no doubt you&#039;ll come up with some howtos for putting it together.

Cheers!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve. You&#8217;re right; Xubuntu is the lightest full Ubuntu distro you can get as a package. If you want to build up with something sparser, Openbox is an option.</p>
<p>Openbox is a very lightweight desktop environment. In a way it looks a lot like Fluxbox or Blackbox. It uses a lot less resources than Gnome, KDE or even XFCE, but requires a little more effort to set up.  A good place to look at nice Openbox setups is on Boxwhore.org. </p>
<p>On a machine like that one, you&#8217;d probably see some real speed improvements. On the other hand, the time it takes to set it up &#8212; and it&#8217;s certainly not very noob-friendly &#8212; might not be worth it to you. Search the forums for Openbox and no doubt you&#8217;ll come up with some howtos for putting it together.</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Farber</title>
		<link>http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Farber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 21:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kmandla.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/ubuntu-6061-on-75mhz-pentium-64mb-15gb-and-openbox/#comment-45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please forgive me asking, but what is &quot;Open Box&quot; and why exactly do I want to take the time to look into it?

I was under the impression that Xubuntu was the lightweight version of Ubuntu for older hardware.  I&#039;m running Xubuntu on an old 600 Mhz Celeron w/256 MB RAM and it is OK, but no speed demon.

What&#039;s the scoop?

Thanks,

Steve]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please forgive me asking, but what is &#8220;Open Box&#8221; and why exactly do I want to take the time to look into it?</p>
<p>I was under the impression that Xubuntu was the lightweight version of Ubuntu for older hardware.  I&#8217;m running Xubuntu on an old 600 Mhz Celeron w/256 MB RAM and it is OK, but no speed demon.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the scoop?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
